I don't want to act like a smug idiot...
but I like my version of the
patch better for (at least) 2 reasons:
1. The original patch modifications (hack_out_ogg.diff) made by my patch
no longer use "relative" paths (i.e. "../../") and thus comply with any
version of the patch used.
2. My modifications made to the appropriate mod_shout Makefile are much
better, because they use SHOUT_BUILDDIR, which is already defined in
that Makefile, and do not rely on some hard-coded path ("../../../../"
for example). In other words, I think:
patch -d $(SHOUT_BUILDDIR) -p1 < hack_out_ogg.diff (which is what my
patch proposes) is much better than:
patch -p 6 -d ../../../../libs/libshout-2.2.2 < hack_out_ogg.diff (which
is what Alexsey have proposed)
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org