For testing purposes, I'm running FreeSWITCH within an LXC container
(or sometimes even two LXC containers per physical machine) attached
directly to a dedicated NIC. I didn't do performance tests, but it
works without issues.

A couple of years ago when I looked at Docker, it did not allow the
container process to take real-time priority, and it resulted in
FreeSWITCH process to run in the same best-effort priority as all
other processes. I hope it's possible to change now, but I didn't go
into details.




On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Ehsan Minachi <ehsanminachi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We’ve containerized our infrastructure. The only piece left is FreeSWITCH which we’re hesitant. Has anyone run FreeSWITCH under high load in a container? Would love to hear if there are any downsides to running FreeSWITCH in a container.
>
> Thank you,
>
> - Ehsan
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting@freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org