Uh, where did you get that 2nd link from?
That looks like it might be an older version of the library, libmp4 rather than libmp4v2.
libmp4v2 is the dependancy for mod_mp4, not libmp4
-Steve
I would think so. However, upon a closer look on both
Steven Ayre wrote:
>
> Should do, it's the same library. :)
http://mp4v2.googlecode.com/files/mp4v2-1.9.1.tar.bz2 MP4v2 and
http://libmp4.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libmp4/trunk/libmp4/ libmp4
source, it appears MP4v2 uses some different header file names to produce
libmp4v2.so library while libmp4 produces libmp4_static.a library. Perhaps,
those who compiled mod_mp4 on a Linux machine already has libmp4 patched to
produce libmp4v2.so library.
View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/how-to-use-mod-mp4-tp6410226p6431457.html
-----
FreeSWITCH hosted on a Seagate DockStar with OpenWRT and ONLY consumes 3 Watts of electricity.
--
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org