No, I don't. That's why I am asking here for a better solution.
Just curious - why do you need to break them up like this? Do you specifically need one extension per instance? If so, why?-MCOn Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Jian Ren <renjian@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hi,
Currently I am assigning one instance to each extension like below:
<extension name="us.skypeout">
<condition field="username" expression="^10(\d{2})$">
<action application="set" data="skype_instance=$1"/>
</condition>
<condition field="destination_number" expression="^(\d{11})$">
<action application="set" data="hangup_after_bridge=true"/>
<action application="bridge" data="skypopen/interface${skype_instance}/$
</condition>
</extension>
Are there any other ways like to get unused instances from a pool?
I guess it could be something like
condition instance1 available?
bridge instance1
condition instance2 available?
bridge instance2
...
then there could be much more extensions to share skype out.
Could anyone help?
Thanks!
Jian
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org