either one will work.
The drawback of mod_perl is that the code executes inline so run the risk of a mistake in your perl code making FreeSWITCH become less stable.
The drawback of ESL is you are opening a socket connection for each call.


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Nagalenoj <nagalenoj@gmail.com> wrote:

I need to handle some hundreds of call. So, which one can I opt?


Nagalenoj wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
>     I want to know which is the better way to do route calls and control
> calls. I've did a experiment which can be done in both ways, Mod_perl and
> ESL. I don't know which one is better to take.
>     When I see some earlier posts, It is given like Mod_perl has some
> limitations and I don't know what kind of limitations they are.,
>     Can someone say which is better to use and how it is better?
>

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mod_perl-or-ESL-tp25520023p25530677.html
Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org
iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400