My concern is with detribalizing things.
The idea of a bounty does hold some weight because things I don't want to do are the exact things that should have a bounty.
There are a lot of moving parts in a gateway with many threads involved which is why it's a tricky situation.
To what extent do you want to manipulate them? There are a lot of parameters to a gateway so 1 giant api call to create them seems daunting. Re-parsing the config assuming there are new ones has the issue of where to look because we have the gateways that live in the users and the ones that live in the profile and when you do that how do you know when to erase them.
If anything, all I can see is being able to add more by rereading the config or maybe a very elaborate FSAPI call but only being able to *remove* them 1 by 1 via FSAPI.
See the issue?
P.S.
What kind of bounty are we talking about?
Jonas Gauffin napsal(a):
> I would also love to be able to switch gateways at runtime withoutI like the concept of independent profiles, but switching gws without
> restarting the profiles.
>
> Anthony: wont a bounty help either?
>
restarting profile will be very cool.
If bounty will be setted up, I try to unpocket some money :-)
Best regards,
kokoska.rokoska
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org