Raid 1 yes , but no DB in ram


2011/4/27 Avi Marcus <avi@avimarcus.net>
Did you have the Raid 1 and DB in ram on debian, too..?
-Avi


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Antonio Teixeira <eagle.antonio@gmail.com> wrote:
Just a little update for you guys.

I have jumped from debian to centos did a full reinstall +  Raid 1 + DB in Ram.

And was able to get 78 Simult. Calls at only 10 % CPU so there is a huge difference so far from 120 % on debian :\.
Call quality has improved , local lan call quality has rised , G729 Licenses working again thanks Brian West !!!.

I will now start to deploy our IVRs using ESL to see if i can offload some of the load.

Regards
A/T


2011/4/27 Paul Cupis <paul@cupis.co.uk>
On 27/04/11 01:24, Ariel Monaco wrote:
> We had high CPU utilization peaks in the past, which lead to some
> audio issues (clipping). We were using debian at that time, which
> was a customer-side requirement.
>
> I'm not a kernel guru but I remember this had something to do with
> kernel timer cycles and the issue was address by adding "divider=10"
> or "divider=100" as a kernel's boot loader option.

Interesting. This kernel option is designed to reduce the valy of
CONFIG_HZ at run=time, so if you have a 1000Hz kernel, setting
divider=10 at boot time will effectively give you a 100Hz kernel.

This seems to fly in the face of other recommendations on this kernel
setting!

Debian default kernel sets CONFIG_HZ=100
CentOS default kernel sets CONFIG_HZ=1000

Regards,


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org