The sqlite way would be the fastest head to head especially if none of the data is critical.



On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Clinton Goudie-Nice <cgoudie@getjive.com> wrote:
I've got a piece of tech that I'm working on where I don't really need to worry all that much about recreating the FS DB on a reboot.

With that in mind, I'm thinking about one of two options:
1) Sqllite on a ramdisk.
2) Postgres with the db for FS placed on a ramdisk.

What do you think I will get higher performance out of?

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II       ♬ @anthmfs  ♬ @FreeSWITCH  ♬

☞ http://freeswitch.org/  ☞ http://cluecon.com/  ☞ http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH
☞ irc.freenode.net #freeswitch ☞ http://freeswitch.org/g+

ClueCon Weekly Development Call 
☎ sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org  ☎ +19193869900