no it wouldn't

When the channel is not in use it's down.....
it's absent of any activity and not running in the state machine.

This terminology is for the sake of the coder not the guy using the code.



On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
IDLE would make more sense.

/b

On Sep 19, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:

> in openzap, state down is like on-hook... we should change that name
> maybe.





--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org
iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400