But I am getting a badarg error response.

According to this:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13021589/erlang-distributed-message-sending

The left hand atom should be a registered process on the node and therefore the name should matter?



On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang@gmail.com> wrote:
foo means nothing, just forget it.

On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Luis F Urrea wrote:

Hi all,

I am going through the wiki docs here:


But I see in the example that in order to send messages between FS and the registered process fired up by myself the following syntax is used:

(test@example)1>{foo, freeswitch@example} ! {api, status, ""}.
{api,status,[]}

Obviously freeswitch@example represents the node, but I am not familiar with the left hand tuple term being applied the ! operator, usually a Pid number is used in that place.

What would the foo represent?

TIA.


Luis

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server

Official FreeSWITCH Sites

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org