On 10/26/2011 06:49 AM, Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> That being said, unixODBC 2.2 will often segfault under that load, so be
> wary of that (it appears reliable up to about 300 connections, seems to
> reliably fall over at 330). We're in the process of testing 2.3.0 which
> is reportedly better in this regard.
>
>
> This is unfortunate! I was planning to cluster several freeswitch
> instances through the DB server. But if the unixODBC crashes under high
> load, it is a major issue in this regard as there are not many options
> left to implement the cluster.