Hi,

Freeswitch is sending re-invites in each 60 seconds. And it comes with SDP which causes our WebRTC client on Mozilla browser to stop sending media. Is there a way to tell freeswitch not to send the re-invites with SDP?

From: freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 100, Issue 106
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:31:36 +0400

Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to
freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
freeswitch-users-owner@lists.freeswitch.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..."


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: ssinyagin@gmail.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:35:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject)

(now on a normal keyboard)
Kamil,

when you use the "limit" application and increase the user's counter, it keeps its value only within the context where it was originally called. If you, for example, used pieces of the original (Vanilla) FreeSWITCH configuration, there are bind_meta_app bindings which send the call into another context ("features"). Once it's done, the user's limit counter is lost, and you need to increment it again in the new context.

Also, why don't you implement daily and monthly minute limits and block the user as soon as these limits are reached?




 


On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@gmail.com> wrote:

Limit resets as soon as the call leaves the context - could that be the reason?

On Oct 21, 2014 8:44 PM, "Kamil Nigmatullin" <kamil.nigmatullin@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,

Today we had an attack. One of our clients lost password to his SIP account. So with this password attackers made calls on our client's behalf to very expensive destinations.

We have Opensips as a border controller and Freeswitch as a Softswitch. This phone was confugured for 1 concurrent line using module limit of FS. Howerver they somehow managed to make several concurrent calls per one account. On CDR's we found that there was Attended transfer. Does anybody knows what kind of attack was that and how I can protect us against this? Is it sip refer attack when attacker set REFERED BY HEADER?

When I check if limit works whith a sipphone, I see that it worked 100%.

Thanks in advance 

--
Kamil Nigmatullin
Tel: 77272323748
mob: 7 (707) 2517003
Skype: kamil.nigmatullin

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: steveayre@gmail.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:46:25 +0100
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject)

Also do you know how the password was gained? If it was brute-forced look at implementing a secure password policy and using fail2ban to detect and block brute forcing attacks

On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@gmail.com> wrote:
(now on a normal keyboard)
Kamil,

when you use the "limit" application and increase the user's counter, it keeps its value only within the context where it was originally called. If you, for example, used pieces of the original (Vanilla) FreeSWITCH configuration, there are bind_meta_app bindings which send the call into another context ("features"). Once it's done, the user's limit counter is lost, and you need to increment it again in the new context.

Also, why don't you implement daily and monthly minute limits and block the user as soon as these limits are reached?




 


On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@gmail.com> wrote:

Limit resets as soon as the call leaves the context - could that be the reason?

On Oct 21, 2014 8:44 PM, "Kamil Nigmatullin" <kamil.nigmatullin@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,

Today we had an attack. One of our clients lost password to his SIP account. So with this password attackers made calls on our client's behalf to very expensive destinations.

We have Opensips as a border controller and Freeswitch as a Softswitch. This phone was confugured for 1 concurrent line using module limit of FS. Howerver they somehow managed to make several concurrent calls per one account. On CDR's we found that there was Attended transfer. Does anybody knows what kind of attack was that and how I can protect us against this? Is it sip refer attack when attacker set REFERED BY HEADER?

When I check if limit works whith a sipphone, I see that it worked 100%.

Thanks in advance 

--
Kamil Nigmatullin
Tel: 77272323748
mob: 7 (707) 2517003
Skype: kamil.nigmatullin

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: krice@freeswitch.org
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:11:14 +0000
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH.org Infrastructure Upgrades Nearing Completion

New Post on freeswitch.org from krice387
check it out at http://ift.tt/1yhZf5f
FreeSWITCH.org Infrastructure Upgrades Nearing Completion
The FreeSWITCH Core Team has been working crazy hours since last Friday to upgrade all the servers the servers that support FreeSWITCH.org!
At this time services such as jira, confluence, fisheye, stash and the G729 activation server are back to normal.
We are working to bring anything else we might have missed back online.
If you find something that’s broken please let us know.
If you wish to help sponsor this work hit the Donate button and put leave us a note it is to help with move expenses.



--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: kamil.nigmatullin@gmail.com
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:31:02 +0600
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] (no subject)

The password was lost by client. Not by brouteforce on other site and I defenetly use fail2ban.  That;s not the issue.
I don't have any transfers within  meta bind app.  I think it was some kind of sip reffer attack.

2014-10-22 6:46 GMT+06:00 Steven Ayre <steveayre@gmail.com>:
Also do you know how the password was gained? If it was brute-forced look at implementing a secure password policy and using fail2ban to detect and block brute forcing attacks


On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@gmail.com> wrote:
(now on a normal keyboard)
Kamil,

when you use the "limit" application and increase the user's counter, it keeps its value only within the context where it was originally called. If you, for example, used pieces of the original (Vanilla) FreeSWITCH configuration, there are bind_meta_app bindings which send the call into another context ("features"). Once it's done, the user's limit counter is lost, and you need to increment it again in the new context.

Also, why don't you implement daily and monthly minute limits and block the user as soon as these limits are reached?




 


On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@gmail.com> wrote:

Limit resets as soon as the call leaves the context - could that be the reason?

On Oct 21, 2014 8:44 PM, "Kamil Nigmatullin" <kamil.nigmatullin@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,

Today we had an attack. One of our clients lost password to his SIP account. So with this password attackers made calls on our client's behalf to very expensive destinations.

We have Opensips as a border controller and Freeswitch as a Softswitch. This phone was confugured for 1 concurrent line using module limit of FS. Howerver they somehow managed to make several concurrent calls per one account. On CDR's we found that there was Attended transfer. Does anybody knows what kind of attack was that and how I can protect us against this? Is it sip refer attack when attacker set REFERED BY HEADER?

When I check if limit works whith a sipphone, I see that it worked 100%.

Thanks in advance 

--
Kamil Nigmatullin
Tel: 77272323748
mob: 7 (707) 2517003
Skype: kamil.nigmatullin

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



--
Kamil Nigmatullin
Tel: 77272323748
mob: 7 (707) 2517003
Skype: kamil.nigmatullin