Its probably cases where the call setup didn't work.
Be careful of how much you bring into your script because doing so will move some of the burden handled by efficient c code into the heavy wrapped higher level code.
Fyi, you can use the regular group confirm to execute an app which could be a managed app in place of the dtmf check. Dgroup_confirm_key=exec group_confirm_file=<app> <args>
Also there is loder documentation that won't die that suggests to create a session the session originate rather than just feeding a dial string to the constructor and checking if its ready on the following line.
On Jul 27, 2010 1:47 PM, "Phillip Jones" <pjintheusa@gmail.com> wrote:Hi there,I have an application written in mod_managed that receives a call, originates a call and then bridges the call when the user answers. This app will be extended to call several recipients and offer several chooses when a user answers (so I can not use the stock group_confirm functionality)I am load testing my application with SIPP. At a low cps the application reports no errors. As I increase the call rate I see:[ERR] switch_cpp:910 object is not initalized error message reported by FS.Line 910 seems to coorolate to a Session.Ready() request.To avoid accessing sessions that no longer exist I set my managed session = null in the hanguphook.I am a bit worried by this, because I am thinking this is indicative of a threading issue - i.e. I am not talking to the session I think I am tallking to. Is the Managed session thread safe? Are there any common gotchas?Also should I worry too much about this "object is not initalized" error? Will they cause an issue.On the plus side I can pump 80,000 calls at 5-10 cps through this system with no hung/orphaned channels - so that makes me think the system is ok.Its just those pesky error reports :)Any insight would be welcome.ThanksPhil
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org