Thanks Mike,all clients are webrtc clients behind same freeswitch.At the same time video rtp/rtcp dtls is instant, but audio is waiting for something, my best guess is for rtcp from client to confirm correct ip.port or to do auto correct.Call scenario is A call B and B transfers(refer) call to C.Also I see in those 5 seconds that first client, A sends total of 6 stun username requests and that C answers to them all at the same time, after 5s.Can this be rtcp problem.I was thinking to go through video ice thread and compare it to audio to see how that one works instantly.thanks,MirkoOn Sep 21, 2017 19:55, "Michael Jerris" <mike@jerris.com> wrote:______________________________its not going to negotiate until we get the stun responses. If we are not, you should look if the client is sending them and something is blocking, or why the client is waiting to send them. Sounds broken on client side from the description.On Sep 21, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Mirko Brankovic <mirkobrankovic@gmail.com> wrote:HI,Has anyone experienced DTLS handshake takes 5s to get to SETUP state:2017-09-21 11:40:40.021178 [INFO] switch_rtp.c:3515 Changing audio DTLS state from OFF to HANDSHAKE
2017-09-21 11:40:45.319457 [INFO] switch_rtp.c:3172 Changing audio DTLS state from HANDSHAKE to SETUPIn network dump i see that answering side is not sending STUN for this 5s and then suddenly answers last 5 STUNs from A side.Has anyone encountered this kind of problem ?I have a pcap if necessary...______________________________ _____________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-user s
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/ freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org