Hello,

After deeper checks, I didn't figure out how to forward the call hold on leg B.

Someone has experienced the same issue?

Regards,

Igor.

De : igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com>
Envoyé : jeudi 28 février 2019 15:14
À : 'FreeSWITCH Users Help' <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Objet : RE: [Freeswitch-users] Call hold issue

Not sure to understand your answer. The sendonly party is sending the MOH. Freeswitch switch on recvonly. But leg B has a silence.

Is it normal?

Regards,

Igor.

De : FreeSWITCH-users <freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org> De la part de Mirko Brankovic
Envoyé : mercredi 27 février 2019 11:34
À : FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Objet : Re: [Freeswitch-users] Call hold issue

I think this is a standard behaviour,

so sendonly party will receive MOH or silence if there is no moh and other bridged side will still hear him

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:34 AM <igor.potjevlesch@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

I have a weird behaviour with a call hold scenario. When the customer on leg A is placing the call on-hold (by sending a RE INVITE with sendonly attribute in the SDP), Freeswitch is switching to hold: "Callstate Change ACTIVE -> HELD". But only on the leg A.

The holding is not forwarded  to the leg B. So, it causes the called party not to hear the Music On Hold generated by the calling party.

Any idea of what could result in this behaviour?

Regards,

Igor.

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Services
sales@freeswitch.com
https://freeswitch.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
https://freeswitch.com/oss
https://freeswitch.org/confluence
https://cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
https://freeswitch.com

--

Regards,

Mirko