Here is sipp output and additional numbers for a test I ran with -nosql param.
The test ran 180CPS for ~3500seconds and the rest with 210cps.
Trouble (as in higher system cpu% ) started to appear around 8591seconds into the test.
As you can see below the problem started just before 9124sec into the test 210cps 5sec calls
should not give you a lot more then 1050 concurrent calls.
------------------------------ Scenario Screen -------- [1-9]: Change Screen --
Call-rate(length) Port Total-time Total-calls Remote-host
210.0(5000 ms)/1.000s 5061 9157.32 s 1834024 192.96.201.164:5060(UDP)
0 new calls during 0.000 s period 0 ms scheduler resolution
0 calls (limit 2000) Peak was 2000 calls, after 9124 s
0 Running, 4640 Paused, 0 Woken up
20 dead call msg (discarded) 0 out-of-call msg (discarded)
1 open sockets
Messages Retrans Timeout Unexpected-Msg
INVITE ----------> 1834024 74 0
100 <---------- 1834024 0 0 0
180 <---------- 1834024 0 0 0
183 <---------- 0 0 0 0
500 <---------- 0 0 0 0
502 <---------- 0 0 0 0
503 <---------- 0 0 0 0
408 <---------- 0 0 0 0
480 <---------- 0 0 0 0
200 <---------- E-RTD1 1834024 81 0 0
ACK ----------> 1834024 81
Pause [ 5000ms] 1834024 0
BYE ----------> 1834024 7646 0
503 <---------- 0 0 0 0
200 <---------- 1834024 0 0 0
------------------------------ Test Terminated --------------------------------
----------------------------- Statistics Screen ------- [1-9]: Change Screen --
Start Time | 2013-03-08 15:22:18:204 1362756138.204833
Last Reset Time | 2013-03-08 17:54:55:535 1362765295.535214
Current Time | 2013-03-08 17:54:55:535 1362765295.535437
-------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------
Counter Name | Periodic value | Cumulative value
-------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------
Elapsed Time | 00:00:00:000 | 02:32:37:330
Call Rate | 0.000 cps | 200.279 cps
-------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------
Incoming call created | 0 | 0
OutGoing call created | 0 | 1834024
Total Call created | | 1834024
Current Call | 0 |
-------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------
Successful call | 0 | 1834024
Failed call | 0 | 0
-------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------
Response Time 1 | 00:00:00:000 | 00:00:00:149
Call Length | 00:00:00:000 | 00:00:05:158
------------------------------ Test Terminated --------------------------------
After stopping the load FS still hogs 22.1% of memory.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND15995 freeswit -2 -10 4677m 873m 5028 S 0 22.1 755:28.65 freeswitch
The symptoms of the crash are the same, just now with higher CPS and takes more time (more calls ) before crashing.
I will appreciate any suggestion.
Regards,
Boris Ratner.On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:22 PM, bratner bratner <ratner2@gmail.com> wrote:The original test was done on git master at the date mentioned. The sqlite core.db file was on /run/shm which is a tmpfs on unbuntu 12.04.
I will be recompiling from git master and test running with -nosql.
Testing my existing setup with -nosql seems more stable now running at 210CPS for some time (500k calls already passed) with ~35% idle cpu.
But the free mem is slowly going down. I will let it run untill the kernel will kill it to see how many calls it can handle.
During my tests i did not run FS with RT priority but according to htop some of the threads are scheduled as RT.
My setup is doing bypass-media , thus FS handling only call establishment and teardown on both legs.
cat /proc/<FS pid>/status
Name: freeswitch
State: S (sleeping)
Tgid: 15995
Pid: 15995
PPid: 1
TracerPid: 0
Uid: 999 999 999 999
Gid: 999 999 999 999
FDSize: 64
Groups:
VmPeak: 5002808 kB
VmSize: 5002088 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmPin: 0 kB
VmHWM: 625900 kB
VmRSS: 624156 kB <-- this is going up
VmData: 4855788 kB
VmStk: 136 kB
VmExe: 20 kB
VmLib: 18288 kB
VmPTE: 2352 kB
VmSwap: 0 kB
Threads: 1866
SigQ: 0/18446744073709551615
SigPnd: 0000000000000000
ShdPnd: 0000000000000000
SigBlk: 0000000000000000
SigIgn: 0000000010003006
SigCgt: 0000000180014209
CapInh: 0000000000000000
CapPrm: 0000000000000000
CapEff: 0000000000000000
CapBnd: ffffffffffffffff
Cpus_allowed: ffffff
Cpus_allowed_list: 0-23
Mems_allowed: 00000000,00000003
Mems_allowed_list: 0-1
voluntary_ctxt_switches: 1803
nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches: 23
output of 'top -H' at 180CPS
top - 15:27:00 up 2 days, 5:32, 5 users, load average: 8.19, 91.07, 65.03
Tasks: 2066 total, 3 running, 2063 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 50.1%us, 3.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 45.9%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 4038512k total, 2282260k used, 1756252k free, 114112k buffers
Swap: 0k total, 0k used, 0k free, 1165868k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
16000 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 R 69 15.1 3:10.26 freeswitch
16009 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 33 15.1 1:26.20 freeswitch
16008 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 28 15.1 1:17.30 freeswitch
16007 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 4 15.1 0:10.80 freeswitch
16004 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 2 15.1 0:06.63 freeswitch
19171 root 20 0 18988 2948 944 R 2 0.1 0:00.64 top
18735 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.29 freeswitch
16003 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:01.61 freeswitch
16690 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.42 freeswitch
16730 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.42 freeswitch
16750 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.45 freeswitch
16764 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.44 freeswitch
<more of the above>
....
....
Thanks to all of you ,
Boris Ratner.On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Dmitry Lysenko <dvl36.ripe.nick@gmail.com> wrote:
I can't reproduce such cps load on my ARMv5TE system. )bratner, please give us 'top -H'. I guess freeswitch running at realtime priority.
2013/3/8 Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org>Sqlite is probably getting hammered... Trust me... Mount the fs db dir as tmpfs or use the –nosql flag when starting freeswitch
I routinely run dialer traffic at much higher CPS then thatbi, bo and wa field is low, so it seems that is not disk subsystem.
2013/3/8 Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org>
You are probably hammering the disk subsystem... Keep in mind that FS uses multiple sqlite databases by default... Mount the fs db dir as tmpfs and try again
On 3/7/13 7:35 PM, "Dmitry Lysenko" <dvl36.ripe.nick@gmail.com <http://dvl36.ripe.nick@gmail.com> > wrote:
Hm... But what about huge interrupt and context switching number?
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Ken
http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
http://www.ClueCon.com
http://www.OSTAG.org
irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org