Have you followed all the recommendations for best performances ?

Sorry if that sounds obvious to you but things like:
ulimit -s 240
reducing core loglevel to warning
increasing tx/rx buffer of the ethernet to 4096

Are you hitting only one SIP profie with your stress test ?
Remember there is only one thread per SIP profile.
But some people told me recently on #freeswitch that they had achieved close to 300cps on only one SIP profile.

David Ponzone  Direction Technique
tel:      01 74 03 18 97
gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva
tel:      0811 46 26 26

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.




Le 20/08/2010 à 11:29, Woody Dickson a écrit :

Hi,

I am doing some experiments with Freeswitch by torturing it to see how
the machine's CPU response to heavy loaded situation.
The test is done on a 16 core 5550 dual quad core server running
fedora 2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.x86_64 OS.

What I found so strange was that while CPU usage remains pretty low
and distributed among all cores at 190 - 200 calls per second.  Then,
after added a few more calls per second, all CPU becomes fully
utilized.

Is this due to some wrong setting?  Any idea how I can tweak the
configuration and continue my test?

Thanks,
Woody

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org