Did you happen to ask them if their bong water was stagnate? REALLY? CRLFCRLF? sigh You can bet if Polycom works its ok, if Fanvil doesn’t they are obviously on something that they should share with the class. Words actually fail me on this one… and thats rare. -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest http://www.freeswitchbook.com http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com T: +1.918.420.9001 | F: +1.918.420.9002 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001 ISN: 410*543 Skype:briankwest PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED) On Mar 6, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Yehavi Bourvine <yehavi.bourvine@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > As a part of a tender for IP phones I am testing TLS with various phones against FS v 1.2.17. > > SNOM and Poylcom works ok. Yealink did not, but they got enough debug information to create a fix. > > Fanvil claims that the SIPS packet generated by FS does not end with CRLFCRLF, thus they fail parsing it, and ask me to add this suffix. > > Who is right? FS or Fanvil? I can browse the sources and try to add this to see whether it helps, but I have no idea what it might break... > > Thanks, __Yehavi: _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org