On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Carole O. <carole.olivier@enst.fr> wrote:

It would be unique you are right but I am not sure I can get its value if A
puts the call on hold, calls C and wants to add it to the conference whose
name dependent of the uuid of another session.
I think if I use ${uuid} to add C I will have the uuid of the session
between A and C and not A and B no?
And I really have to configure this from the dialplan so statically.

Am I wrong somewhere??

Carole

Rupa Schomaker (lists)-2 wrote:
>
> On 12/17/2008 7:34 AM, Carole O. wrote:
>> My main problem is the name of the conference. Since everybody should be
>> able to convert a simple call into a conference, the conference's name
>> has
>> to be unique each time. I have chosen to make it dependent on the caller
>> number which is not perfect because then he is the only one which can
>> bridge
>> the call and add member. However, I do not have any other idea, maybe I
>> have
>> missed another possibility.
>
> If the conf name has to be unique, why not ensure that by making the
> conference name based on the uuid of the a-leg?
>
>> Thanks,
>> Carole
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/dynamic-conference-tp21053181p21054080.html

Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________

Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org