On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Sangwoo Jin wrote:
>
> I can't use JIRA because I'm waiting for confirmation of creating
> account.
>
> Now, I tested again with the current svn trunk.
> The lost memory of 1000 calls is 10 times more than 100 calls.
>
> The following logs are my filtered valgrind's output.
> I have removed the lost blocks log which may not have to be free.
>
> Could you check this problem?
> Sangwoo Jin
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> 100 calls' log
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> ==29384== 284 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
> 25 of 60
> ==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29384== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> ==29384== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> ==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
>
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 504 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 30
> of 60
> ==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29384== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> ==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 671 bytes in 8 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 32
> of 60
> ==29384== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==29384== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> ==29384== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> ==29384== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> ==29384== by 0x7D0273D: header_parse (msg_parser.c:1114)
> ==29384== by 0x7D025E3: extract_header (msg_parser.c:1071)
> ==29384== by 0x7D02315: msg_extract_header (msg_parser.c:1008)
> ==29384== by 0x7D05BD2: msg_header_parse_str (msg_parser.c:2801)
> ==29384== by 0x7D05B1E: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2764)
> ==29384== by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 1,072 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> 37 of 60
> ==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29384== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> ==29384== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> ==29384== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> ==29384== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> ==29384== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> ==29384== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> (switch_core_session.c:787)
> ==29384== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==29384== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/
libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> ==29384== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/
libc-2.6.1.so)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 1,295 bytes in 21 blocks are still reachable in loss
> record 38 of
> 60
> ==29384== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==29384== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> ==29384== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> ==29384== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> ==29384== by 0x7D11E7A: msg_header_make (msg_header_make.c:86)
> ==29384== by 0x7D05A73: msg_header_add_make (msg_parser.c:2729)
> ==29384== by 0x7D7B503: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:256)
> ==29384== by 0x7D433D8: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2377)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 28,116 bytes in 99 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> record 55 of
> 60
> ==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29384== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> ==29384== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> ==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 52,528 bytes in 98 blocks are definitely lost in loss
> record 56 of
> 60
> ==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29384== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> ==29384== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> ==29384== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> ==29384== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> ==29384== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> ==29384== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> (switch_core_session.c:787)
> ==29384== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==29384== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/
libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> ==29384== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/
libc-2.6.1.so)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 57,034 bytes in 871 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> record 57
> of 60
> ==29384== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==29384== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> ==29384== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> ==29384== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> ==29384== by 0x7D11E7A: msg_header_make (msg_header_make.c:86)
> ==29384== by 0x7D05A73: msg_header_add_make (msg_parser.c:2729)
> ==29384== by 0x7D7B503: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:256)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29384==
> ==29384==
> ==29384== 135,046 (49,896 direct, 85,150 indirect) bytes in 99
> blocks are
> definitely lost in loss record 58 of 60
> ==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29384== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> ==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29384== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> ==29384==
> ==29384== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==29384== definitely lost: 108,035 bytes in 303 blocks.
> ==29384== indirectly lost: 85,177 bytes in 972 blocks.
> ==29384== possibly lost: 2,535 bytes in 13 blocks.
> ==29384== still reachable: 16,325,250 bytes in 524 blocks.
> ==29384== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> 1000 calls' log
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 3,024 bytes in 6 blocks are still reachable in loss record
> 39 of
> 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> ==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 3,692 bytes in 13 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> 43 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> ==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 4,322 bytes in 55 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> 47 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==29612== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9CAA2: su_strdup (su_strdup.c:55)
> ==29612== by 0x7D05AF3: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2759)
> ==29612== by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 5,360 bytes in 10 blocks are still reachable in loss
> record 49 of
> 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> ==29612== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> ==29612== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> ==29612== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> ==29612== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> ==29612== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> (switch_core_session.c:787)
> ==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/
libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/
libc-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 5,360 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> 50 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> ==29612== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> ==29612== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> ==29612== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> ==29612== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> ==29612== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> (switch_core_session.c:787)
> ==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/
libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/
libc-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 7,056 bytes in 14 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> 51 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> ==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 9,940 bytes in 35 blocks are still reachable in loss
> record 54 of
> 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> ==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 43,590 bytes in 663 blocks are still reachable in loss
> record 57
> of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==29612== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9CAA2: su_strdup (su_strdup.c:55)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA8FC9: su_vsprintf (su_sprintf.c:80)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA90FA: su_sprintf (su_sprintf.c:125)
> ==29612== by 0x7D75737: sip_addr_tag (sip_basic.c:993)
> ==29612== by 0x7D765F1: sip_from_tag (sip_basic.c:1857)
> ==29612== by 0x7D43155: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2322)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 55,728 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss
> record 58 of
> 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0xFCE0A57: sf_open (sndfile.c:285)
> ==29612== by 0xFCD9FD3: ??? (mod_sndfile.c:174)
> ==29612== by 0x40A04A1: switch_core_perform_file_open
> (switch_core_file.c:100)
> ==29612== by 0xFD3549A: ??? (mod_local_stream.c:178)
> ==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/
libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/
libc-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 270,368 bytes in 952 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> record 59
> of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> ==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 542,088 bytes in 8,282 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> record
> 60 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> ==29612== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> ==29612== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> ==29612== by 0x7D0273D: header_parse (msg_parser.c:1114)
> ==29612== by 0x7D025E3: extract_header (msg_parser.c:1071)
> ==29612== by 0x7D02315: msg_extract_header (msg_parser.c:1008)
> ==29612== by 0x7D05BD2: msg_header_parse_str (msg_parser.c:2801)
> ==29612== by 0x7D05B1E: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2764)
> ==29612== by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 1,305,502 (493,920 direct, 811,582 indirect) bytes in 980
> blocks
> are definitely lost in loss record 62 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> ==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> ==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> 2361)
> ==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> ==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> ==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> 276)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> ==29612==
> ==29612==
> ==29612== 526,154 (525,280 direct, 874 indirect) bytes in 980 blocks
> are
> definitely lost in loss record 63 of 64
> ==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> ==29612== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> ==29612== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> ==29612== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> ==29612== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> ==29612== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> ==29612== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> ==29612== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> ==29612== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> (switch_core_session.c:787)
> ==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> ==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/
libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/
libc-2.6.1.so)
> ==29612==
> ==29612== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==29612== definitely lost: 1,024,811 bytes in 2,066 blocks.
> ==29612== indirectly lost: 812,483 bytes in 9,236 blocks.
> ==29612== possibly lost: 20,718 bytes in 94 blocks.
> ==29612== still reachable: 16,441,313 bytes in 1,217 blocks.
> ==29612== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
freeswitch-
>>
users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Jerris
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:26 PM
>> To:
freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Memory Leaks
>>
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Sangwoo Jin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I I'm testing freeswitch with sipp.
>>> My test configuration is the following:
>>> Sipp(caller) -> freeswitch -> Sipp(callee)s
>>> Testing loads are 5 CPS ~ 30 CPS and caller has hanged up a call as
>>> soon as
>>> receiving 200 OK.
>>>
>>> In this testing environment, freeswitch's used memory is growing
>>> continuously.
>>>
>>> The following is the valgrind's log on testing with 5 CPS 100 calls.
>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this problem's cause configuration mistake or freeswitch's bug?
>>>
>>> Sangwoo Jin
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> You will need to compare the valgrind output from about 100 calls to
>> about 1000 calls to see which are actually larger. Also, please make
>> sure you are using current svn trunk. Most of the items in that list
>> appear to be things that we allocate at startup and never bother to
>> free as they are free when the application stops. Those items are
>> supposed to be allocated for the entire life of the switch. If you
>> have reports that are definitely more please report this to our bug
>> tracker at
http://jira.freeswitch.org with exact details how you are
>> testing including how you are initiating the call and your dialplan.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>>
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>
http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org