I've never been clear on how this works.

However, the most typical case - you get a USER_BUSY so don't try any more carriers - I've found to my surprise that other carriers sometimes are able to complete the call...

-Avi

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Victor Chukalovskiy <victor.chukalovskiy@gmail.com> wrote:

Greetings,

Just discovered that fail_on_single_reject does not work with "|"
operator...

Not sure if it was always the case or a recent "improvement"

Is there something equivalent that can be used with sequential bridge,
that is with | operator?
The goal is that if I bridge to
"sofia/gw1/5555555555|sofia/gw2/5555555555 and I get one of the
rejection codes I expect over gw1 it should not attempt  gw2

Thx!
-Victor

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org