Apologies if you’ve seen this before, but not sure if anyone got it due to the mail issues and I’m still scratching my hairless head ;) ...
> On 31 May 2017, at 14:57, Rick Jarvis <rick@magicmail.mooo.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is a dumb question, but it’s something I’ve always struggled with that I’m convinced should be quite straightforward.
>
> Getting one FS to register with another as an extension (I know there are other ways of getting FS to talk together, but this is the situation I’m faced with).
>
> Box one (the host) is not behind NAT.
> Box two (the client) IS behind NAT.
>
> In my mind it should be good enough to have a directory entry on box one, and a SIP profile on box two, then something like a catchall dial plan entry on box 2 to accept the calls made to the ‘extension’ it’s registered as and handle the call accordingly. But I don’t think it’s that simple?
>
> I’ve looked through the soft phone configuration, which suggests using a directory entry with the register flag set to true, but this doesn’t seem to help me.
>
> Thanks
> R
____________________________________________________________ _____________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch- users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/ options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
Brian West
brian@freeswitch.org
Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com
Book a phone call (CST)
Allison prompts for FreeSWITCH:
Got Bugs? Report them here! | Reddit: /r/freeswitch
T:+19184209001 | F:+19184209002 | M:+1918424WEST (9378)
Skype:briankwest