Steve,
I couldn’t resolve this issue last time .
I analyzed the problem with people from Kamailio´s list, and Kamailio behavior is correct, because de second INVTE isn’t a RE-INVITE so it shouldn’t have a CSeq increase, is a New Invite to the same destination with RURI different, but same Call-ID.
How can I managed this in freeswitch, I can´t increase CSeq in kamailio´s configuration, because it behaves as a proxy LCR.
Please some help here.
Regards,
Camila T
From: Camila Troncoso [mailto:ctroncoso@redvoiss.net]
Sent: martes, 19 de febrero de 2013 13:06
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: RE: [Freeswitch-users] Kamailio+Freeswitch SBC
Thanks fot the reply,
The problem is that Kamailio LCR doesn’t increment the Cseq by itself in the second invite , I will try to do this by configuration.
Regards,
Camila T
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre
Sent: martes, 19 de febrero de 2013 12:51
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Kamailio+Freeswitch SBC
You should increment the CSeq for the next INVITE. FreeSWITCH is complying with the SIP standard which does this to cope with packet loss.
-Steve
On 19 February 2013 15:35, Camila Troncoso <ctroncoso@redvoiss.net> wrote:
Steve,
The Invite is the same , because the LCR retries the call to the second route he has. The only change is in the Ruri part. How can I handle this. I want FreeSWITCH to handle this second invite for the call to reach his destiny.
Regards,
Camila T.
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steven Ayre
Sent: martes, 19 de febrero de 2013 12:27
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Kamailio+Freeswitch SBC
This probably means the INVITE FS receives is a duplicate of one it has already received, so it's assuming the client is resending a duplicate INVITE for a call it has already handled.
-Steve
On 19 February 2013 15:12, Camila Troncoso <ctroncoso@redvoiss.net> wrote:
Hi all,
I’m working for a while with Kamailio+Freeswitch as SBC.
of s
I have this structure:
When I make a call, from one client coneccted to LCR, it is route to my SBC and afterwards to his destiny in the cloud passing thourgh a gateway. When the destiny is unreachable, the LCR reroutes the call to another gateway. Sometimes the LCR send this retry again to the SBC , becouse the second gateway is also in the cloud, but when this happens, Fresswitch answer with :
“482 Request merged”.
Is there a way to solve this?
Regards,
Camila Troncoso | Ingeniero de Desarrollo
RedVoiss |ctroncoso@redvoiss.net
Santiago - Chile | +56 2 2408535
www.redvoiss.net
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org