number ranges - up to you. The sample configs supplied are just that, samples. I use a smaller range personally.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Matthew Law
<matt@webcontracts.co.uk> wrote:
Why is that? - a lot of web pages I have read claim that IAX is more
secure and efficient. I have no problem with using SIP whatsoever and it
certainly appears to be ubiquitous. I am a complete newcomer to VoIP and
I am trying to do this as securely as possible since I want to run
freeswitch on a Xen VPS which will be visible on the internet.
Anyway, since my first question, I have worked my way through the wiki,
read a lot of example configs and made some sense of the docs. I now have
a very basic config working (with SIP) on a local vmware image using the
'quick and dirty' Makefile method. I removed all of the example configs
from the xml files (those default extensions and passwords scared me) and
added just one for extension 1000, plus my dialplan and inbound/outbound
settings.
One question: is there any reason not to use a smaller extension number
range, like 200-210, for example?
Now to figure out how to get time based roaming working...
Thanks,
Matt.
On Fri, February 5, 2010 6:43 am, Michael Jerris wrote:
> iax2 support has been removed from FreeSWITCH in current trunk and will
> not be in the 1.0.5 release.
>