On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Dennis
<odermann@googlemail.com> wrote:
> you would get a hangup event in either case.
yes, you are right. we just tested and saw that. the reason for
sendmsg hangup, was the sometimes useful event-lock.
it works with api uuid_kill as we wanted. but with sendmsg hangup it
still does not work. shouldn't sendmsg hangup work like uuid_kill
here? how useful could it be, to let it ring, when the hangup was
already sent and is immediately executed when the anser is sent?
#2 now works perfectly. thanks for the great support!