This is invalid.
Those places are where sip calls are created and they are most definitely not leaking.
If anything, it suggests dialogs that are up still and not yet destroyed at the termination of the program.
If this location in the code was a leak it would be gigs not megs missing.
Did you do the exact command I said (especially -vg param to FS) and then a full clean shutdown all the way back to the shell?
Are you maybe not getting the BYE to your calls creating open dialogs?
You may want to turn on the sip trace.
Valgrind doesn't show leaks in mod_nibblebill, most of the leaked memory was
in mod_sofia:
==12476== 53,064 bytes in 67 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 138 of
141
==12476== at 0x4026378: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/x86-
linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so)
==12476== by 0x6A0DC8F: sofia_handle_sip_i_invite (sofia.c:6538)
==12476==
==12476==
==12476== 92,664 bytes in 117 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 139 of
141
==12476== at 0x4026378: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/x86-
linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so)
==12476== by 0x6A2F76F: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1874)
==12476==
BTW, do I understand FS code correct that channel private data are always
handled by sqlite, even if I enable core ODBC?
On Monday 19 April 2010, Anthony Minessale wrote:
> 300M is tiny. try having 2000 channels up you can soar into a gig of usage.
>
> That valgrind report only showed 100k leaked which means it was all
> accounted for and torn down in the end.
>
> If you can find a specific leak in the nibble bill module with valgrind we
> will gladly fix it and you
> can gladly thank us for giving you a way to make money by the second.
>
> valgrind --tool=memcheck --log-file=vg.log --leak-check=full
> --leak-resolution=high --show-reachable=yes
> /usr/local/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch -vg
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Sergey Okhapkin
>
> <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org>wrote:
> > Which valgrind options should I specify? I did run
> >
> > valgrind --tool=memcheck --log-file=vg.log --leak-check=full --leak-
> > resolution=high --show-reachable=yes ./freeswitch -nonat -vg
> >
> > 100K leaked is nothing compared to FS process RSS of 300M...
> >
> > On Sunday 18 April 2010, Anthony Minessale wrote:
> > > Also thatb suggests you leaked a whopping 100k
> > >
> > > On Apr 18, 2010 11:35 AM, "Anthony Minessale" <
> >
> > anthony.minessale@gmail.com>
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > That's not very useful you need a full report with extended checking.
> > >
> > > > On Apr 18, 2010 7:34 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > According to v...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday 17 April 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:
> > > > That is a completely incorrect statement. Usi...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org