We have test platform on FreeBSD and working platform on Debian. I found only one pricipial difference between platforms: on Debian we have native Corosync/Pacemaker, which are the best tool for clustering until mod_ha_cluster will released.

But our platform is not working under huge load, we are not released our prudct still.

2014-12-12 16:04 GMT+03:00 Thomas Løcke <thomas.granvej6@gmail.com>:

Hey all,

I'm involved in a project where we'll soon need to spin up a couple of FreeSWITCH instances, and we're a bit torn between Debian and FreeBSD.

Anybody out there with experience with both? Are there any differences? Will Debian be "better" due to FreeSWITCH primarily targeting Linux?

We're very slightly leaning towards FreeBSD due to jails, ZFS and other nice FreeBSD tools, but we're not averse to Debian in any way. We're probably at 52% FreeBSD and 48% Debian.

The instances will run on hardware with decent specs. No less than 16 cores (probably 32) and no less than 32GB RAM and SSD in every single bay. We're not targeting low spec.

Any and all advice is welcomed with open arms.

:o)
Thomas Løcke

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

with best regards,

Dmitriy Borisov