Linux control.huji.ac.il 2.6.32.5 #1 SMP Sat Jan 23 11:17:10 IST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 3000.000
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips : 6000.32
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 3000.000
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips : 5999.17
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Thanks! __Yehavi:
What distro are you on and kernel version?cat /proc/cpuinfouname -aand such/b
On Feb 16, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
Strange, even on abusive testing we have not seen this problem.
please update to latest trunk.
There was only one change I can think of that may cause your issue and I added a patch for it.
If it persists try setting the sql-in-transactions profile param to false.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Yehavi Bourvine <yehavi.bourvine@gmail.com> wrote:
Most of the queries are ok, only some fail, thus it doesn't look like permission problem. Furthermore, under 1.0.5pre10 it works for months.Might it be thread unsafe function calls? I've found the following while searching the WEB:According to the MSDN docs, System.Timers.Timer operates in a thread pool. If that's the case, your code is breaking the "connections cannot be shared across threads" rule for SQLit
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org