This produces:

send 639 bytes to udp/[62.239.15.140]:5060 at 09:06:29.640488:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 91.121.159.57:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKQFFy1Ug5DcU0S

Max-Forwards: 70

From: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>;tag=NKaDDXrtme3Sr

To: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>

Call-ID: 88de957f-0907-4488-9b19-043ff13391f4

CSeq: 118570058 REGISTER

Contact: <sip:gw+05061292117@91.121.159.57:5080;transport=udp>

Expires: 3600

User-Agent: THOMSON ST2030 hw5 fw1.56 00-1F-9F-16-4E-99

Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, UPDATE, REGISTER, INFO

Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces

Content-Length: 0

------------------------------------------------------------------------

recv 726 bytes from udp/[62.239.15.140]:5060 at 09:06:29.656368:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 91.121.159.57:5080;received=91.121.159.57;branch=z9hG4bKQFFy1Ug5DcU0S;rport=5080

From: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>;tag=NKaDDXrtme3Sr

To: <sip:05061292117@bmnha-01.bt.com;transport=udp>;tag=SD567ec99-8a92eaf49d827b084b51e364ec68ae70.bc35

Call-ID: 88de957f-0907-4488-9b19-043ff13391f4

CSeq: 118570058 REGISTER

WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="bmnha-01.bt.com", nonce="4a77fb4b6fe33ffccf77e6bdd6f7a7a397cdfd17", qop="auth"

Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.6 (sparc/solaris))

Content-Length: 0

Warning: 392 sip:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=9150 req_src_ip=172.20.92.61 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:bmnha-01.bt.com out_uri=sip:bmnha-01.bt.com via_cnt==1"

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2009-08-04 11:06:29.655585 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:1460 05061292117 Registration Failed with status Operation has no matching challenge [904]. failure #1 and so on.

Should my side not have responded at this point with another REGISTER with auth information in?

From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: 04 August 2009 04:36
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Outbound Proxy

Put the real hostname in register-proxy and outbound-proxy and the proxy needs to hold the fake one.

On Aug 3, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Darren Williams wrote:

The bmnha-01.bt.com is the one that doesn’t resolve

www.bbvservice-560129.bt.com resolves to 62.239.15.140

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4299 (20090802) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com