Thanks. I also had this license thing in mind and didnt like this sipml business! May be i should have framed my question differently. So, what i want to know is how the webrtc solution will look like with fs ? Because frankly there is no information about it anywhere except some of the mailing list old emails which also doesnt give this information. Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Can you please explain how the overall solution will look like once this
webrtc support in FS effort completes ?
Will it be the way asterisk is used in many of these demos (One example
here
<http://highsecurity.blogspot.in/2012/12/webrtc-and-asterisk-11-using-sipml5.html>
) In a sense that sipml5 (SIP stack in the browser) is necessarily there on
the browser side. My interest here is to understand the topology here how
FS will help connecting the legacy SIP devices with browser and what will
come into the picture in between.
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/Webrtc-tp7580875p7586790.html
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org