I have several carriers, and I use:<action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=true"/>... so I was a little surprised to see that a call that ended with NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE didn't route advance.I dug into the PCAPs of this and comparable, and the only difference I noticed was that the ones that worked were invite -> 100 and then 503 NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILURE and the one that didn't work was invite -> 100, 183, and then 503.I have a lua script that told me:session:getVariable("originate_disposition") = SUCCESSsession:getVariable("bridge_hangup_cause") = NORMAL_TEMPORARY_FAILUREso... I'm guessing that a 183 marks the originate as a success which is why continue_on_fail didn't work, since it wasn't a fail.Is this expected? Is the carrier "doing something wrong" here?They did helpfully send: "SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable - Route Advance"More importantly: how can I fix it?Thanks,-Avi Marcus
BestFone
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org