Is there a reason to think that CentOS 6 would cause threads to fail to spawn? This is basically just calling libapr, which is code from like 8 years ago.
Vladislav: This means it failed to create a thread (switch_thread_create in switch_apr.c). FS generates a ton of threads. The only time I’ve seen this was a long
time ago on 32-bit Windows, since default stack of 1MB means you hit address space limits pretty quickly. But on 64-bit, you should be able to go all out.
I’d start by adding some if’d printf’s to check the various things that switch_thread_create does and try to pinpoint what is failing. If the libapr call is failing,
then you should be able to create a minimal program that just spawns threads and see if that one is able to get 1000+. From there I’d guess troubleshooting is gonna be the same as figuring out why pthread_create fails and that should be generic to your system.
(Please post if you figure out why.)
If other apps are able to spawn and keep thousands of threads and just FS isn’t then I guess you’re unlucky?
-Michael
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org]
On Behalf Of Giovanni Maruzzelli
Sent: Monday, 14 December, 2015 10:57
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Thread failure with low CPU utilization?
centos 6 is not supported by FreeSWITCH 1.6 !
-giovanni
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Vladislav Ivanov <deforceczt@gmail.com> wrote: