Not really.  If you have a test that shows "good/bad" we (devs) can find the reason for a problem.  git handles choosing versions for testing and you handle the "good/bad" decision.  The end result is "here is the git version where performance changes" which tony or whomever can then look at the patch and decide what he wants to do about it.

2010/8/6 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of FS internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling which could help?

Regards

2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa@rupa.com>
sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate where the performance change occurs.


On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch@gmail.com> wrote:
My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25%
performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new
GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance
drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am
unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so
the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on
a ramdisk.

2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>:
> No one experiment this same issue?
>
> I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
>
> Regards
>
> 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks
>> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems with
>> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH Version
>> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve this
>> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn version.
>> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a dual
>> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I can see
>> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version) and
>> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more cpu
>> than before. Any idea?
>> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider.
>>
>> Regards
>
>
--
Eliot Gable

"We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our
children." ~David Brower

"I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing
from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even
considered to be a crime." ~David Brower

"Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to
live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero



--
-Rupa

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
-Rupa