turning off media timeout is perfectly ok, its not even valid to use media timeouts, we have it as a courtesy.
sip session timers is the valid method.
The threshold for rtp timeout is supposed to be consecutive packets lost, not over the duration of the call. Please double check that there is not some long run of silence or something causing an actual rtp timeout, and if you can confirm that, please open a bug on jira for this issue.MikeOn Apr 15, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Francisco Scaramanga wrote:Über Messenger günstiger telefonieren? Sagen Sie "Ja" zu JAJAH! _______________________________________________Now I am using stable release 1.0.6 and have a MEDIA_TIMEOUT again, because function rtp_common_read counts missed packets.
During a long session of several hours the amount of missed packets exceeds the limit.
Now I changed my .\conf\sip_profiles\internal.xml and set the rtp timeout to 0, which means no timeout.
set <param name="rtp-timeout-sec" value="0"/>
My usecase is to have long duration calls. Can I do this without cross-effects, or is not wise to set rtp timout to 0?
> From: mike@jerris.com
> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:08:32 -0400
> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] MEDIA_TIMEOUT after long duration call
>
> That being said, for a change things have been somewhat quiet after the 1.0.6 release. There have been some bug fixes that went in after, but not the usual frenzy of reports right after a release.
>
> Mike
>
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:23 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:
>
> > We are no longer on SVN, we have now moved to GIT for the 1.0.6 release.
> >
> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Download_FreeSWITCH
> >
> > Note that the latest most stable version is always likely to be latest
> > GIT version not the latest tagged released, as there will often be
> > bugs present in the releases that are fixed in the latest GIT version.
> > Tagged releases have more to do with the introduction of new features
> > (such as G729 support in 1.0.6) than any guarantee of stability.
> >
> > -Steve
> >
> >
> > On 14 April 2010 09:00, Francisco Scaramanga <scaram@hotmail.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, I see http://svn.freeswitch.org/svn/freeswitch/tags/1.0.rc6
> >> I thought it is a release candidate, isn't it? Is it safe to use it in
> >> production?
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org