On 26 Jan 2018, at 12:11, Markus Badberg -PLY <markus@ply.com> wrote:

It seems, that it has something to do with NAPTR Records.

I’ve no clue about that. I’m running a simple DNS-Resolver on pfsense. No full DNS Server. Maybe could be this the problem?

How do i fix NAPTR Records?

Here is the logging output from freeswitch:

tport.c:2749 tport_wakeup_pri() tport_wakeup_pri(0x7f529c0042c0): events IN

tport.c:2864 tport_recv_event() tport_recv_event(0x7f529c0042c0)

tport.c:3205 tport_recv_iovec() tport_recv_iovec(0x7f529c0042c0) msg 0x7f529c003230 from (udp/192.168.170.204:5060) has 4 bytes, veclen = 1

tport.c:3023 tport_deliver() tport_deliver(0x7f529c0042c0): bad msg 0x7f529c003230 (4 bytes) from udp/192.168.170.10:5060/sip next=(nil)

2018-01-26 12:05:56.939301 [NOTICE] sofia_reg.c:448 Registering 9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f

nua.c:622 nua_register() nua: nua_register: entering

nua_stack.c:569 nua_stack_signal() nua(0x7f5294024b60): recv signal r_register

nua_params.c:480 nua_stack_set_params() nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering

soa.c:403 soa_set_params() soa_set_params(static::0x7f529c0360a0, ...) called

nua_dialog.c:338 nua_dialog_usage_add() nua(0x7f5294024b60): adding register usage

nua_stack.c:529 nua_signal() nua(0x7f5294024b60): sent signal r_register

nta.c:4417 nta_leg_tcreate() nta_leg_tcreate(0x7f529c038a40)

nta.c:2665 nta_tpn_by_url() nta: selecting scheme sip

sres_cache.c:272 sres_cache_get() sres_cache_get(0x7f529c002c40, SRV, "_sip._udp.9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f.") called

sres_cache.c:318 sres_cache_get() sres_cache_get(0x7f529c002c40, SRV, "_sip._udp.9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f.") returned 1 entries

nta.c:10598 outgoing_query_srv() nta: for "9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f" query "_sip._udp.9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f" SRV (cached)

sres_cache.c:272 sres_cache_get() sres_cache_get(0x7f529c002c40, A, "9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f.") called

sres_cache.c:318 sres_cache_get() sres_cache_get(0x7f529c002c40, A, "9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f.") returned 1 entries

nta.c:10803 outgoing_query_a() nta: for "9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f" query "9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f" A (cached)

nta.c:1348 set_timeout() nta: timer shortened to 5000 ms

nua_stack.c:271 nua_stack_event() nua(0x7f5294024b60): event r_register 503 DNS Error

nua_dialog.c:397 nua_dialog_usage_remove_at() nua(0x7f5294024b60): removing register usage

nta.c:4470 nta_leg_destroy() nta_leg_destroy(0x7f529c038a40)

nua_stack.c:359 nua_application_event() nua: nua_application_event: entering

nua.c:366 nua_handle_magic() nua: nua_handle_magic: entering

2018-01-26 12:05:56.939301 [ERR] sofia_reg.c:2447 9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f Failed Registration with status DNS Error [503]. failure #99

nua.c:366 nua_handle_magic() nua: nua_handle_magic: entering

2018-01-26 12:05:57.939301 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:505 9bde7ac0-4a8f-4937-ab2e-0c213e8c1d2f Failed Registration [503], setting retry to 30 seconds.

nta.c:9101 outgoing_timer_dk() nta: timer K fired, terminate REGISTER (118146314)

greetings

Von: FreeSWITCH-users <freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org> on behalf of Volodymyr Fedorov <lexxua@gmail.com>
Antworten an: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Datum: Freitag, 26. Januar 2018 um 10:25
An: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org>
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trouble connecting Sangoma Vega 50 BRI to Freeswitch

Hi, maybe pcap with register towards to Freeswitch will be useful.

I had vega euro 50 with FXS ports and combination works without any issue.

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:09 PM, badhills <markus@ply.com> wrote:

Hi,

i have trouble connecting my Sangoma vega 50 BRI to Freeswitch.

I setup the Vega in quick setup, with user and password.

Then i setup the gateway in freeswitch. But both sides are getting forbidden
and unauthorized messages.
In the freeswitch log is a dns failure, but dns seems to working great. I
can't find issues there.

Unfortunately, I haven't found anything suitable yet and I'm getting
desperate. It can't be that hard. If I configure extensions, it works fine
and I can make internal calls with 2 or more phones. The connection to the
gateway isn't very different, is it?

Under Asterisk with Freepbx I already got this to work, but I wanted to try
it with FreeSwitch.

Had anybody a working connection and could explain it a lil bit to me?

kind regards,
Markus



--
Sent from: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

--

Best regards,

Volodymyr

_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org