Just read that today as well but so far from my usage I haven't had any issue with it. I did see a slight clarification on Twitter.
"Gitolite does much more than Gitlab needs."

So I guess theory is replacing it completely with just what they need and can integrate more closely instead of something written before GitLab existed would be better. I don't have anything bad to say about Gitolite from my usage of it even before GitLab.

-- W


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe@gundy.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:11 PM, William Suffill
<william.suffill@gmail.com> wrote:
> GitLab is decent for those that care for a similar frontend ala Github but
> hosted in house. Built on top of Gitolite in RoR.

Kinda off topic here, but GitLab is dropping Gitolite in v5. They're
rolling their own. They say there are too many issues with it.


Gabe

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org