Thanks Anthony & Brian. I learned more than the limits of my box in
this thread :). Hard to believe it is hard coded. I did google on this
subject but got no answer before changed my test case to generate less
threads.
Even harder to believe it still has this limit on a 12 core. So, I
guess no one is running (or will run) in production on Mac. But Mac is
a good platform for developers and we still can do fancy things on it
like fscomm that's why FS support Mac isn't it?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Brian West <
brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Sad part is that 2560 thread limit on OS X is still there... and they sell a freakin 12 core Mac Pro now.. I have a bug open on apples bug tracker over this issue for like two years now.
/b
On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
Mac indeed has some unfair hard-coded 2500 thread limit that we can't
explain, we've seen it all along.
Don't trust the load avg on linux when you have lots of rtp, it's not
real its thrown off because of all the rtp traffic causing scheduler
wait.
anyway, you learned the limits of your box for yourself, good job!
That's what I like to see.
naturally, you get better or worse results depending on how many cpu
you have or how fast each one is.
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Blog:
http://www.dujinfang.comProj:
http://www.freeswitch.org.cn_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org