I'm all for IPv6, just get your firewalling right, depending on your OS it doesn't always share rules automatically. Don't forget your machine will usually have at least 3 addresses too, which can of course be bound and firewalled individually.

But as the others have said, the main issue is support in existing kit. Only a fraction of my devices support IPv6. It's good for some things and not doing something just because no-one else is will never push the progression on. The more demand we create for IPv6, the more likely ISPs are to take it up.

On 23 August 2012 15:43, Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
Sorry, I just woke up: "there end of the tunnel" = "their end of the tunnel".

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Kristian Kielhofner <kris@kriskinc.com> wrote:
> Assuming you're in the US (or most other parts of the world besides
> Asia); it won't work.  Here's why:
>
> Almost no last mile providers will deliver native IPv6 (currently).
> Your customers would have to use a tunneling service like HE to even
> get to you.  First there are hassles setting up the tunnel in the
> first place, then there are issues with latency, packet loss, jitter,
> etc using a tunnel service that has to haul all of your IPv6 in IPv4
> traffic back to their gateway in a central location.  VoIP is just
> about the worst service you could use via an IPv6 tunnel.
>
> You could try to offer your own IPv6 tunneling service but there's
> still the issue of customers setting up there end of the tunnel.
> Besides, encapsulation sucks.
>
> The IPv4 global routing table has at least 424,000 networks:
>
> http://bgp.potaroo.net/index-bgp.html
>
> The IPv6 global routing table has 10,215 networks:
>
> http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/
>
> Granted IPv6 networks tend to be better organized and more "compact"
> (at least as far as advertisements are concerned) but that's still a
> factor of 40:1.
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Alex <alex@thewinelake.com> wrote:
>> We've been wondering about trying to offer a service on ipv6 as it would
>> get around various LAN issues.
>>
>> Just wondered what experiences (good or bad) people here have had with
>> it and also why there isn't more "'buzz"?
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting@freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
>> http://www.cudatel.com
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> --
> Kristian Kielhofner



--
Kristian Kielhofner

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



--
Andrew Cassidy BSc (Hons) MBCS SSCA
Managing Director


T 03300 100 960  F 03300 100 961