I guess I misunderstood your question.  The phones aren’t behind a nat WITH the FreeSWITCH.  FreeSWITCH is in collocation site, the phones are in my office, and connecting to FreeSWITCH through the nat.

Maybe they wanted to call it Brian but then someone complained that it would be to common ;)

-Adam

From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 5:47 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Bria softphone registration issue (NAT/rport issue?)

Well if the Bria Phone is behind nat with FS why is the sonic wall even involved? (Btw... I just realized they can't spell Brian... Bria... who calls a phone Bria?)

/b

On Jan 18, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Adam Ford wrote:

Yes, but the nat is handled by the Sonicwall, which works perfectly for the Polycom desk phones.   It is only the Bria softphones that are behaving strangely.  I think it is just caused by them attempting to use rport, which is sort of doing to work of the Sonicwall twice, causing them to lose sync with the FreeSWITCH registration.  I just wanted the opinion of some other professionals if this sound likely, before I consider the matter resolved.

Thank you,

-Adam