NORMAL_CIRCUIT_CONGESTION would've been the cause you were looking for.

Mathieu

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ron McCarthy <ronmccar@gmail.com> wrote:
I actaully just used respond with a 503 and that sends back a "Service unavailable".

If I do: <anti-action application="hangup" data="NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION" /> I get a busy back on the other side, it looks like application="respond" actaully works better in this case.

Thanks for the help!



On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:

We use the standard rfc q.850 to sip cause code map so you can set continue_on_fail=true and hangup with the q.850 that maps to 503 (I forgot what it is atm)

On Jan 25, 2009 12:09 PM, "Ron McCarthy" <ronmccar@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Is it possible to have FS send a 503 / no route found error back? I have looked and have not seen a place where you can add a custom sip response code like this. I want to return a 503 if they can't call that destination, instead of a 404 basically.

Any help would be great, thanks!


_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org