On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Madovsky <infos@madovsky.org> wrote:
So why not GPL or Gnu Affero public licence ?

Long story short: the FS devs wanted a different kind of freedom than that which is offered by the GPL. The GPL is "viral" in that it forces everything it touches to by GPL-compatible. This kind of force-fed freedom doesn't always fit well with software that is technically a library (libfreeswitch) that can be compiled/embedded in other projects.

Bottom line: no OSS license can be all things to all projects. Tony chose the best one available for his specific project.
-MC