Hi Brian,


Any considerations when running as a container vs a VM?

Thanks,

-Chris




____________________________
Chris Ferreira
Founder & CEO
Numina Networks, Inc.
Voice: 201-510-2560
Fax: 866-577-3411
Chris@GoNumina.com

We Simplify
IT
™

Network With Us:
FacebookTwitter



On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Um we run our entire infrastructure on Proxmox and VM/Containers ... I say go for it.
--
Brian West
brian@freeswitch.org
FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC
PO BOX PO BOX 2531
Brookfield, WI 53008-2531
Twitter: @FreeSWITCH_Wire
T: +1.918.420.9266  |  F: +1.918.420.9267  |  M: +1.918.424.WEST
iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9266
UK: +44 20 3298 4900
ISN: 410*543





On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Steven Schoch <schoch+freeswitch.org@xwin32.com> wrote:

> In setting up a PBX to run FreeSwitch, I have allocated a machine that is overpowered, so the best use of this resource is to put a hypervisor such as Xen on it, and make it available for other office uses.
>
> Is there any reason why running FreeSwitch on a VM is a bad idea?
>
> --
> Steve


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org