Very interesting. Thanks for sharing this. I must read up on it.
On 15 March 2010 02:17, Jason White
<jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote:
> Its nice to hear more people have this working. The more that depend on
> this .. the simpler my job is... because If we break it they start to open
> jira's about it.
If both parties behind NAT could just go and register with
http://tunelbroker.net/ or http://www.freenet6.net/ or http://www.sixxs.net/
or a similar service, or lobby their ISPs to introduce native IPv6, this
problem would start to go away.