We've made no attempts to add any optimization flags on unix to date.
We use the defaults and always build debug binaries.
When we get some spare time we might go back and turn them on but so far
we don't have much of a need to.
I'm not asking what they do, I'm asking those more familiar with FS
whether the optimization flags are too aggressive for FS. What do you
guys (developers) normalize use, just your basic -march=i686 -pipe ?
Gabe
> brian@freeswitch.org <mailto:brian@freeswitch.org>
Brian West wrote:
> Usually if you don't know what they do... then you shouldn't use them! ;)
>
>
> /b
>
> On Mar 27, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Gabriel Kuri wrote:
>
>> regarding gcc compiler optimizations, are they generally compatible with
>> FS or should they be removed or does the configure strip them out? just
>> curious, as I run Gentoo and use such optimizations as "-march=nocona
>> -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
>>
>> not sure if they break things or I should be removing them before
>> compiling FS?
>>
>> Gabe
>
> Brian West
>
> -- Meet us a ClueCon! http://www.cluecon.com <http://www.cluecon.com/>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org