Sorry I missed today's calls.

The broken out RPMs look awesome. Were you able to configure the erlang stuff? Not sure if you and Stephen connected.

Stephen is also a Ruby guy so happy to help test any parts there…

From: Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org>
Reply-To: <freeswitch-maintainers@lists.freeswitch.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:53:13 -0600
To: <freeswitch-maintainers@lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: [Freeswitch-maintainers] Well this is a little late now since google waited so long to bounce it back to me...

Well this is a little late now since google waited so long to bounce it back to me...
Hey Guys,

Reminder Call today on 996...

Items we have to hit

1. RPMs are rolling out... Expect Community Announcement
2. Travis-CI
3. Testing Framework in Ruby
4. Config changes the work for everyone (including windows)
5. Question/Answer...
   

Short call today guys...

And a Pre Announcement

K

Quick update in its place...

Community announcement on RPMs today we’re announcing general availability of the RPMs for Cent5 and 6 32 and 64 bit today.
This is what I believe will be the final packaging structure. I do want to move to FHS for the final Release RPMs. That will also be announced today

I am looking at Travis-CI for the a CI environment Why? It looks just as good as all the rest and via Bougyman aka TJ we have direct contact with the developers. This will give us the CI goodness that keeps the FS project independent of other projects/services for CI and allow us to roll nightly builds that are atleast tested to some extent.

Testing Framework in Ruby is underway by Community Member Deryl. This framework is well underwant and supports testing the current default dialplan and will be extended with more test over time. See http://cukes.info/ for the framework he is using. Leads us into the future with general unit testing.


On the config changes. I have figured out a super simple way to support the current dev environment while not breaking future config deployment. We have a pre-processor on the XML with including capability why not just use that... Installed configsets from the RPMs will be separate and linked into place so we don’t break things... But what happens as a developer when I try to run freeswitch from inside the source tree? It breaks... Simple file... Freeswitch.xml in conf that points to the right configsets freeswitch.xml and boom we’re set... This should fix windows and *nix issues for dev at the same time.
I would still like to find someone intimate witht he windows installer for production/stable builds to help out with a proper installed for Windows where we can give endusers this same type of choice

Sorry for the delayed email I sent the other stuff out about 10:30 my time this morning and google failed to notify me of the bounce antil 11:40 (10 minutes after we were supposed to be on the call...

In this case we’ll try another call at everyones convience...

Any questions or comments place get with me

Ken
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-maintainers mailing list Freeswitch-maintainers@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-maintainers

---

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-maintainers mailing list
Freeswitch-maintainers@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-maintainers