Hi, I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago. I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects. Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/ It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation. Thanks, Adam
I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.
On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org> wrote:
Hi,
I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.
I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.
Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/ <https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/>
It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.
Thanks,
Adam
For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;) I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go. If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.
On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org> wrote:
Hi,
I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.
I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.
Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/
It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.
Thanks,
Adam
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
You can turn off the ability to file issues and PR on GH if so desired. I think it is great GH is being more flexible on their strict checking (I had also filed a ticket previously but back then they were not doing such adjustments). If FS doesn't want an official GH mirror it would be nice if there was an unofficial community one. Yes stash can do many of the same items but the GH interface is very easy, it has a far larger base of people who already have accounts. ~mitch On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chad Phillips <chad@apartmentlines.com> wrote:
For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;)
I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go.
If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.
On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org> wrote:
Hi,
I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.
I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.
Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/
It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.
Thanks,
Adam
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
You do realize that Stash/BitBucket works pretty much the same way as github? Not to mention what happens when github decides its no free anymore or starts including unwanted stuff in your downloads? “well github would never do those things” yeah and googlecode wouldn’t shutdown, and sourceforce would never include adware in their installers either From: FreeSWITCH-dev [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Mitch Capper Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:00 AM To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] mirror to GitHub? You can turn off the ability to file issues and PR on GH if so desired. I think it is great GH is being more flexible on their strict checking (I had also filed a ticket previously but back then they were not doing such adjustments). If FS doesn't want an official GH mirror it would be nice if there was an unofficial community one. Yes stash can do many of the same items but the GH interface is very easy, it has a far larger base of people who already have accounts. ~mitch On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chad Phillips <chad@apartmentlines.com <mailto:chad@apartmentlines.com> > wrote: For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;) I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go. If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com <mailto:mike@jerris.com> > wrote: I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value. On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org <mailto:adam@spicenitz.org> > wrote: Hi, I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago. I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects. Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/ It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation. Thanks, Adam _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
It is true it is just GH is a more familiar workflow for many people and they already have accounts. We are just talking about a mirror, not the official repo. IF GH changes their practices down the line then it could go away. It isn't an issue to have an unofficial mirror but it would seem an official mirror is also not a big deal. ~mitch On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org> wrote:
You do realize that Stash/BitBucket works pretty much the same way as github? Not to mention what happens when github decides its no free anymore or starts including unwanted stuff in your downloads?
“well github would never do those things” yeah and googlecode wouldn’t shutdown, and sourceforce would never include adware in their installers either
*From:* FreeSWITCH-dev [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Mitch Capper *Sent:* Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:00 AM *To:* freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-dev] mirror to GitHub?
You can turn off the ability to file issues and PR on GH if so desired. I think it is great GH is being more flexible on their strict checking (I had also filed a ticket previously but back then they were not doing such adjustments). If FS doesn't want an official GH mirror it would be nice if there was an unofficial community one. Yes stash can do many of the same items but the GH interface is very easy, it has a far larger base of people who already have accounts.
~mitch
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chad Phillips <chad@apartmentlines.com> wrote:
For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;)
I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go.
If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.
On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org> wrote:
Hi,
I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.
I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.
Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/
It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.
Thanks,
Adam
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
The FreeSWITCH team has no plans to spend any time on this, or interest in doing so.
On Dec 28, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Mitch Capper <mitch.capper@gmail.com> wrote:
It is true it is just GH is a more familiar workflow for many people and they already have accounts. We are just talking about a mirror, not the official repo. IF GH changes their practices down the line then it could go away. It isn't an issue to have an unofficial mirror but it would seem an official mirror is also not a big deal.
~mitch
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org <mailto:krice@freeswitch.org>> wrote: You do realize that Stash/BitBucket works pretty much the same way as github? Not to mention what happens when github decides its no free anymore or starts including unwanted stuff in your downloads?
“well github would never do those things” yeah and googlecode wouldn’t shutdown, and sourceforce would never include adware in their installers either
From: FreeSWITCH-dev [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org>] On Behalf Of Mitch Capper Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:00 AM To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] mirror to GitHub?
You can turn off the ability to file issues and PR on GH if so desired. I think it is great GH is being more flexible on their strict checking (I had also filed a ticket previously but back then they were not doing such adjustments). If FS doesn't want an official GH mirror it would be nice if there was an unofficial community one. Yes stash can do many of the same items but the GH interface is very easy, it has a far larger base of people who already have accounts.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chad Phillips <chad@apartmentlines.com <mailto:chad@apartmentlines.com>> wrote:
For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;)
I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go.
If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com <mailto:mike@jerris.com>> wrote:
I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.
On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org <mailto:adam@spicenitz.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.
I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.
Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/ <https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/>
It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Ken Rice <krice@freeswitch.org> wrote:
You do realize that Stash/BitBucket works pretty much the same way as github? Not to mention what happens when github decides its no free anymore or starts including unwanted stuff in your downloads?
“well github would never do those things” yeah and googlecode wouldn’t shutdown, and sourceforce would never include adware in their installers either
and github will never sell to Microsoft ;)
*From:* FreeSWITCH-dev [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Mitch Capper *Sent:* Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:00 AM *To:* freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-dev] mirror to GitHub?
You can turn off the ability to file issues and PR on GH if so desired. I think it is great GH is being more flexible on their strict checking (I had also filed a ticket previously but back then they were not doing such adjustments). If FS doesn't want an official GH mirror it would be nice if there was an unofficial community one. Yes stash can do many of the same items but the GH interface is very easy, it has a far larger base of people who already have accounts.
~mitch
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chad Phillips <chad@apartmentlines.com> wrote:
For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;)
I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go.
If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.
On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <adam@spicenitz.org> wrote:
Hi,
I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.
I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.
Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/
It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.
Thanks,
Adam
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
-- About: http://about.me/dujinfang Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com Proj: http://www.freeswitch.org.cn
participants (6)
-
Adam Goode
-
Chad Phillips
-
Ken Rice
-
Michael Jerris
-
Mitch Capper
-
Seven Du