[Freeswitch-dev] record session core freeswitch on sun510
hello, Recently I have comiled and run freeswitch1.06 on a sun510 server. Everything worked smoothly,except when I began to test function: record_session. the freeswitch cored. dbx trace shows core occurred in the function switch_core_media_bug_read. line231:z += (int32_t) * (dp + x); or line217: *(tp++) = *(dp + x); I realize the reason is different byte order of a int16_t on Intel and sparc. but because I don't understand the logic of bug_read, I don't know how to fix this issue. anyone can help? thx
Lei, First things first - are you on the latest git revision? If so then I would recommend that you report this as a bug in JIRA. (jira.freeswitch.org) It will be much easier for the devs to keep track of this issue if it is logged in the tracking system. If you have any questions about what to do when reporting bugs check this page for tips: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs Thanks for taking the time to dig into this issue. A few more minutes to log it into JIRA will make it much easier to fix. -MC On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:19 AM, lei shan <stdanley@gmail.com> wrote:
hello, Recently I have comiled and run freeswitch1.06 on a sun510 server. Everything worked smoothly,except when I began to test function: record_session. the freeswitch cored. dbx trace shows core occurred in the function switch_core_media_bug_read. line231:z += (int32_t) * (dp + x); or line217: *(tp++) = *(dp + x);
I realize the reason is different byte order of a int16_t on Intel and sparc. but because I don't understand the logic of bug_read, I don't know how to fix this issue.
anyone can help? thx
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
I'll try the git version next week. thanks On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Lei,
First things first - are you on the latest git revision? If so then I would recommend that you report this as a bug in JIRA. (jira.freeswitch.org) It will be much easier for the devs to keep track of this issue if it is logged in the tracking system. If you have any questions about what to do when reporting bugs check this page for tips:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs
Thanks for taking the time to dig into this issue. A few more minutes to log it into JIRA will make it much easier to fix. -MC
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:19 AM, lei shan <stdanley@gmail.com> wrote:
hello, Recently I have comiled and run freeswitch1.06 on a sun510 server. Everything worked smoothly,except when I began to test function: record_session. the freeswitch cored. dbx trace shows core occurred in the function switch_core_media_bug_read. line231:z += (int32_t) * (dp + x); or line217: *(tp++) = *(dp + x);
I realize the reason is different byte order of a int16_t on Intel and sparc. but because I don't understand the logic of bug_read, I don't know how to fix this issue.
anyone can help? thx
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
Next week is NOT optimal. We are in the release process for the next version of FreeSWITCH... does anyone else have a sun510 box they can test this on? Its not acceptable to say their is a bug then run away for a week leaving us wondering... we all suffer from various levels of OCD and its stuff like this that drives us crazy :P /b On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:14 AM, lei shan wrote:
I'll try the git version next week.
thanks
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Lei,
First things first - are you on the latest git revision? If so then I would recommend that you report this as a bug in JIRA. (jira.freeswitch.org) It will be much easier for the devs to keep track of this issue if it is logged in the tracking system. If you have any questions about what to do when reporting bugs check this page for tips:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs
Thanks for taking the time to dig into this issue. A few more minutes to log it into JIRA will make it much easier to fix. -MC
Chill, Brian, in case you'd not noticed, it's Friday.. next week's but a few short hours away. Or there's always QEMU for testing things which might be endianness-dependent. Cheers -- Dave
Next week is NOT optimal. We are in the release process for the next version of FreeSWITCH... does anyone else have a sun510 box they can test this on? Its not acceptable to say their is a bug then run away for a week leaving us wondering... we all suffer from various levels of OCD and its stuff like this that drives us crazy :P
/b
On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:14 AM, lei shan wrote:
I'll try the git version next week.
thanks
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Lei,
First things first - are you on the latest git revision? If so then I would recommend that you report this as a bug in JIRA. (jira.freeswitch.org) It will be much easier for the devs to keep track of this issue if it is logged in the tracking system. If you have any questions about what to do when reporting bugs check this page for tips:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs
Thanks for taking the time to dig into this issue. A few more minutes to log it into JIRA will make it much easier to fix. -MC
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
-- David Knell, Director, 3C Limited T: +44 20 3298 2000 E: dave@3c.co.uk W: http://www.3c.co.uk
Hehe we are working on getting the next FreeSWITCH out the door... thats why its not optimal :P /b On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:59 AM, David Knell wrote:
Chill, Brian, in case you'd not noticed, it's Friday.. next week's but a few short hours away.
Or there's always QEMU for testing things which might be endianness-dependent.
Cheers --
Dave
Next week is NOT optimal. We are in the release process for the next version of FreeSWITCH... does anyone else have a sun510 box they can test this on? Its not acceptable to say their is a bug then run away for a week leaving us wondering... we all suffer from various levels of OCD and its stuff like this that drives us crazy :P
/b
hi, I cant visit git repository directly because firewall block the port, but the latest snapshot(http://files.freeswitch.org/freeswitch-snapshot.tar.gz) is ok? On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Hehe we are working on getting the next FreeSWITCH out the door... thats why its not optimal :P
/b
On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:59 AM, David Knell wrote:
Chill, Brian, in case you'd not noticed, it's Friday.. next week's but a few short hours away.
Or there's always QEMU for testing things which might be endianness-dependent.
Cheers --
Dave
Next week is NOT optimal. We are in the release process for the next version of FreeSWITCH... does anyone else have a sun510 box they can test this on? Its not acceptable to say their is a bug then run away for a week leaving us wondering... we all suffer from various levels of OCD and its stuff like this that drives us crazy :P
/b
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
Sounds like an overzealous firewall admin. :P /b On Jul 11, 2010, at 8:44 PM, lei shan wrote:
hi, I cant visit git repository directly because firewall block the port, but the latest snapshot(http://files.freeswitch.org/freeswitch-snapshot.tar.gz) is ok?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Hehe we are working on getting the next FreeSWITCH out the door... thats why its not optimal :P
/b
participants (4)
-
Brian West
-
David Knell
-
lei shan
-
Michael Collins