DB update of 11th February -- is it just me?
Hi there, Just wondered -- has anyone had problems since the registration db commit of Friday 11th? I'm running fS on a Mac TiBook (PPC, running Mac OS X 10.5.8), so this is waaaay off the standard target. Having updated to head on a cleaned system, the new fS dumps a core on startup. Did a git revert -n a2c0da53f368f0b11340c3a72814c93b182753b7, followed by make sure. Problem went away. ---- As a minor issue, the new code seems to generate an error report well before fS segs. This error says that the registration db doesn't have a field "real". Looking at the patch for the a2c0da53f368f0b11340c3a72814c93b182753b7 commit, this error seems to tie in with the change to switch_core_sqldb.c, and the static char create_registrations_sql[]= bit, where there's an added line (1638): create index regindex1 on registrations (user, real, hostname)\n"; Was that intended? Putting this as: create index regindex1 on registrations (user, realm, hostname)\n"; removes the error report. Sorry for the delay in reporting, but it takes ages to do anything on this old machine and it is locked away without a reliable Internet connection. all the best, Lawrence
already fixed On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk> wrote:
Hi there, Just wondered -- has anyone had problems since the registration db commit of Friday 11th?
I'm running fS on a Mac TiBook (PPC, running Mac OS X 10.5.8), so this is waaaay off the standard target.
Having updated to head on a cleaned system, the new fS dumps a core on startup.
Did a git revert -n a2c0da53f368f0b11340c3a72814c93b182753b7, followed by make sure. Problem went away.
----
As a minor issue, the new code seems to generate an error report well before fS segs. This error says that the registration db doesn't have a field "real".
Looking at the patch for the a2c0da53f368f0b11340c3a72814c93b182753b7 commit, this error seems to tie in with the change to switch_core_sqldb.c, and the static char create_registrations_sql[]= bit, where there's an added line (1638): create index regindex1 on registrations (user, real, hostname)\n";
Was that intended?
Putting this as: create index regindex1 on registrations (user, realm, hostname)\n"; removes the error report.
Sorry for the delay in reporting, but it takes ages to do anything on this old machine and it is locked away without a reliable Internet connection.
all the best, Lawrence
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900
participants (2)
-
Anthony Minessale
-
Lawrence Conroy