I am not sure even after re-reading what your question is, could you
try to rephrase?
Mike
On Jan 29, 2009, at 8:00 AM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
I found it out by myself!
(why is it that we always come with the solution right after posting
to
the list?)
I inserted :
thread_params = switch_core_session_alloc(session,
sizeof(*thread_params));
before the pool initialization.
But still, can I get some answers to the questions bellow about
how to effectively handle memory allocations?
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
I have the code below :
struct radacct_thread_handle {
switch_core_session_t *session;
switch_mutex_t *mutex;
switch_thread_cond_t *cond;
};
static switch_status_t my_on_routing(switch_core_session_t *session){
switch_thread_t *thread;
switch_threadattr_t *thd_attr = NULL;
switch_memory_pool_t *pool;
struct radacct_thread_handle *thread_params = NULL;
pool = switch_core_session_get_pool(session);
thread_params->session = session;
...
}
when the program reaches the last line (thread_params->session =
session;)
I get a core dump. Is this a memory allocation error? Is it because
I am
making
use of the wrong pool? Please enlighten me because I am not an
experienced c
programmer, and I am struggling to get familiar with the FS API.
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-dev mailing list
Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org