Tony, the swigged version of ESL python module is not at all pythonic. As an example the use of get header for events that could use a more pythonic syntax like dicts do. I didn't mean to say that I wanted to no use the ESL C implementation as base at all, I just meant that the wrapper could be done using a tool that would make the python module more pythonic but still keeping the underlying implementation in C intact. Maybe that is doable using swig an if that's the case please ignore my own stupidity. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 15, 2014, at 9:30 PM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> wrote:

Why would you want to make a non-swig version of the ESL lib?  The whole point is to make sure you get a reliable client.
Everyone who tries to make their own runs into one of many challenges that are hard to overcome in a script lang.  This is why you have the benefit of the wrapped C lib.

xml_rpc has a bit less capability and is for sure less stable and scalable when put head to head with ESL.
I wrote both of them myself so I'm not driven by affinity to one or the other.  AFAIK xml_rpc is stable but the lib used is not so hot and I always wanted to use something better.









On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:10 PM, canuck15 <canuck15@hotmail.com> wrote:

I sort of figured someone would say that.  Actually mod_xml_rpc seems to be similar to mod_xml_curl. Since I already have that mod_xml_curl fetches from my app  working well I don’t think I will switch that.  Also just read that fs_cli uses ESL so that has sold me on sticking with it.  I just want to make sure I am not using features that are a bit on the fringe where it’s not very active, well tested, and fixes don’t come along very often.

 

From: freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Jerris
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:17 AM
To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] mod_event_socket or mod_xml_rpc?

 

They are completely different tools for different jobs, not a one or the other situation.

 

On Jan 15, 2014, at 1:32 PM, canuck15 <canuck15@hotmail.com> wrote:



I am trying to update an old abandoned app (WikiPBX) which is written using Django Python and uses mod_event_socket and mod_xml_curl to talk with Freeswitch.

 

I’ve got most things working except the most important part which is mod_event_socket.  Now I found mod_xml_rpc which seems like a better way to go.

 

Just wanted to get some opinions which is the better api interface before I get too far into trying to get mod_even_socket working properly.  So far it’s been quite the headache.  I am currently looking at fusionpbx and bluebox code to see what they are doing.

 


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II       ♬ @anthmfs  ♬ @FreeSWITCH  ♬

ClueCon Weekly Development Call 
☎ sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org  ☎ +19193869900 

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org